Individual skill

siggraph-experiments

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering head-to-head comparisons against the strongest prior method, ablations, performance/timing reporting with hardware, image/geometry quality metrics, perceptual and user studies, and matching the evidence to the graphics claim shape.

SIGGRAPH-Skills/skills/siggraph-experiments/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# SIGGRAPH Experiments

SIGGRAPH acceptance turns on **evidence proportional to a graphics claim**: a technique that claims
to be faster must be timed against a real baseline on stated hardware; one that claims higher
quality must be compared, quantitatively and visually, against the strongest prior method. This
skill matches evaluation to claim shape and pre-empts the domain-expert reviewer's first
objections. Anchor policy to `resources/official-source-map.md`.

## Match evidence to the claim

| Claim shape | Evidence the reviewer expects | Common failure |
|---|---|---|
| "Higher quality" | Head-to-head vs SOTA with a metric (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/FLIP; Hausdorff/normal error for geometry) + side-by-side visuals + video | Only one's own results shown; no baseline |
| "Faster / real-time" | Wall-clock vs baseline at **equal quality**, with GPU/CPU, driver, resolution | Timing at unequal quality; no hardware stated |
Back to top