Individual skill

socs-qualitative

Use for the qualitative path in 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — fieldwork ethnography, in-depth interviews, the extended case method, or grounded theory. Ensures material richness, coding transparency, reflexivity, and trustworthiness, and pushes from story-retelling toward concept building. Use when the draft is a narrative without analytic traction.

Sociological-Studies-Skills/skills/socs-qualitative/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 定性路径(socs-qualitative)

## 触发时机

- 材料是田野民族志、深度访谈、扩展个案、历史比较
- 稿子读起来像"讲了个好故事",但没分析抓手
- 审稿担心:"材料够吗、编码透明吗、能不能信"

## 立场:材料厚度 + 分析深度 + 可信度

本刊接纳定性传统,但门槛不低于定量。**复述故事不是分析;从材料中提炼概念/机制、与理论往返,才是。**

## 方法路数(明确你站在哪一支)
Back to top