Individual skill

jegeo-topic-selection

Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript so it genuinely bridges geographical economics and human geography. Tests two-community fit and scope; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-topic-selection/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Topic Selection (jegeo-topic-selection)

## When to trigger

- The core question is set but you are unsure it reads as *economic geography* rather than urban economics, trade, or generic applied micro
- The paper has strong empirics but no obvious reason a geographer would care, or rich geography but nothing that engages the economics frontier
- You suspect the question is really a Journal of Urban Economics or Regional Studies paper wearing a JEG cover letter
- A coauthor asks whether the topic clears JEG's bar before months of data work

## The two-community test (the first gate)

JEG's defining constraint is that it serves **geographical economics** (formal/quantitative NEG and quantitative-spatial models) AND **proper economic geography** (institutional, evolutionary, qualitative human geography), with an editorial board drawn roughly equally from both. The fastest way to lose at JEG is to write a paper only one community can love. Before anything else, force the question through both lenses:

- **Economist's lens:** Is there a clear economic mechanism (agglomeration externality, knowledge spillover, trade cost, sorting, increasing returns) and a credible way to learn about it? Would a quantitative spatial economist see a real question, not a regional case report?
Back to top