Individual skill

eer-referee-strategy

Use when anticipating the objections a European Economic Review (EER) referee will raise — under single-anonymized review across any field — and pre-empting them before submission. Maps likely pushback to fixes; it does not draft the response letter (use eer-rebuttal after a decision).

European-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/eer-referee-strategy/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Referee Strategy (eer-referee-strategy)

## When to trigger

- The paper is near-complete and you want to pre-empt predictable referee objections
- You are unsure who the likely referees are and what they will attack
- An editor desk-screen risk needs reducing (breadth/novelty/fit)
- Before submission, to convert anticipated objections into in-paper defenses

## The EER referee reality

EER review is **single-anonymized**: the referee sees who the authors are. The referee is typically an **expert in your exact design or field** and frequently **someone you cite**. Two gates precede them: an **editor desk-screen** (out-of-scope or low-novelty papers are rejected without review, and the **submission fee is non-refundable**), then **≥2 external referees** for an independent assessment (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). The first decision is usually fast; the strategic move is to **pre-empt the predictable objections in the paper itself** so a referee has less to grab.

## Map objection → pre-emption
Back to top