Individual skill
naacl-review-process
Use when reasoning about how a NAACL decision actually gets made — the division of labor between ACL Rolling Review (reviews, meta-review) and the NAACL program committee (commitment-stage acceptance into Main or Findings), where author leverage exists at each stage, and how the skipped-year calendar shapes committee behavior.
NAACL-Skills/skills/naacl-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- productivity Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,682 bytes
Read excerpt
# NAACL Review Process
NAACL outsources reviewing and keeps deciding. Understanding which body owns
which judgment tells you where effort pays and where it evaporates.
## The two-stage machine
**Stage 1 — ARR (weeks 0-10 of a cycle).** Three or more reviewers score
the paper; an action editor synthesizes a meta-review. ARR produces an
assessment, not an acceptance: nothing is "in" anywhere yet. Authors see
everything and may respond mid-cycle or carry the package away.
**Stage 2 — NAACL commitment.** Authors forward the frozen package (paper,
reviews, response threads, meta-review) to NAACL through OpenReview by the