Individual skill
ssi-supplementary
当需要为《中国科学:信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 稿件规划附录、补充材料与多媒体附件、并决定哪些内容放正文、哪些放补充时调用。覆盖正文与补充的划分原则(决定录用的证据必须在正文)、附录用途、补充材料的格式与容量、多媒体/演示附件、以及各栏目(评述/论文/快报)的差异化处理。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰,本刊正文强调科学价值与创新高度,补充材料服务复核而非承载核心论证;具体格式以官网当期须知为准,未确认者标待核实。
Scientia-Sinica-Informationis-Skills/skills/ssi-supplementary/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,711 bytes
Read excerpt
# 《中国科学:信息科学》附录与补充材料(Supplementary)
一篇投往《中国科学:信息科学》(SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, SSI) 的稿件,常需在**正文、
附录、补充材料/多媒体附件**之间分配内容。核心原则只有一条:**决定录用的证据必须在正文里**,
补充材料是给愿意深入的读者与复核的审稿人看的,不能承载评审据以判断科学价值的关键论证。
本刊各栏目篇幅约束不同(评述约 20 页、快报 ≤4 页),划分策略也随之不同。具体附件格式与容量
**以官网当期《投稿须知》为准(待核实)**。
## 一、划分的第一原则:按"决定录用性"分
问自己:**如果审稿人只读正文、不看补充,能否判断本文的核心贡献成立?**
- **能** → 划分合理。
- **不能** → 有决定录用的证据被放到了补充材料,必须移回正文。