Individual skill
jcf-review-process
Use when planning around the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) review process — single-anonymized (single-blind) refereeing, a minimum of two reviewers, an active desk-rejection policy, decision-letter interpretation, and required Elsevier declarations. It sets expectations and timing strategy; it does not draft the manuscript or the rebuttal.
Journal-of-Corporate-Finance-Skills/skills/jcf-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,044 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process (jcf-review-process)
## When to trigger
- Setting expectations for what happens after you submit
- Deciding how to handle the single-anonymized model and required declarations
- Planning for the desk-rejection screen and the reviewer round
## How JCF review works (verified; re-confirm on the official guide)
- **Single anonymized (single-blind) peer review.** Reviewers see the authors' identities; authors do **not** see reviewers. There is **no double-blind anonymization** to perform — do **not** strip your name and affiliation.
- Suitable submissions are sent to a **minimum of two independent reviewers**.
- An **active desk-rejection policy** rejects a non-trivial fraction of papers **without full review** to reduce reviewer burden — the editor screen is real and fast.
- A **competing-interest declaration** is required via Elsevier's declarations tool, and a **generative-AI disclosure** is required at submission.