Individual skill
edbt-review-process
Use when reasoning about how an EDBT research submission is evaluated, covering Microsoft CMT reviewing, the author-feedback phase, the accept / revise / reject decision, the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit second read by the original reviewers, the cycle-to-conference roll, and how EDBT's rolling model differs from SIGMOD/VLDB/ICDE and the co-located ICDT.
EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,503 bytes
Read excerpt
# EDBT Review Process
Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. EDBT's process is a **multiple-cycle
rolling model** with a real **in-cycle revise-and-resubmit**: within one cycle, a paper is reviewed,
gets an author-feedback exchange, receives **accept / revise / reject**, and — if *revise* — is
revised and re-read by the same reviewers before a final accept/reject. The most consequential
mental shift for authors arriving from a one-shot conference is that a *revise* is a genuine second
chance inside the same cycle, not a soft rejection.
## Process model
- Reviewing runs in **Microsoft CMT** (Conference Management Toolkit). Confirm the blind policy for
the cycle — single- vs double-blind is decided per edition (**待核实**; EDBT has historically used
author-identified single-blind reviewing).