Individual skill
isca-reproducibility
Use when making an ISCA paper's results regenerable — pinning simulator versions and local patches, archiving per-figure configuration manifests, recording workload provenance and sampling seeds, quantifying run-to-run variation on real hardware, and keeping the environment resurrectable through the February window.
ISCA-Skills/skills/isca-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# ISCA Reproducibility
In architecture, "reproducible" means someone else — or you, three months later,
mid-rebuttal — can regenerate every reported number from recorded state. Because
most ISCA numbers come out of simulators, reproducibility here is largely
*configuration archaeology*: the result is a function of tool commit, local
patches, model parameters, workload build, region selection, and warm-up policy,
and losing any one of those breaks the chain. The venue reinforces this culture
with post-acceptance artifact evaluation under ACM badging
(`isca-artifact-evaluation`); this skill covers the discipline that must exist
*before* any AE form is filled.
## The result chain, and what to pin at each link