Menu

Individual skill

infocom-related-work

0upvotes

Use when positioning an IEEE INFOCOM submission against the networking literature across INFOCOM, SIGCOMM, NSDI, MobiCom, ICNP, and the journals (IEEE/ACM ToN, IEEE JSAC/TMC), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-blind on EDAS, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap.

INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-related-work/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# INFOCOM Related Work

Use this to audit novelty and eligibility. INFOCOM reviewers are close to the networking literature
across both its analytical and systems wings, and they expect to see where your paper sits relative
to the nearest prior work — stated as a **delta**, not a list. Reopen the current call for
dual-submission, double-blind, and prior-publication rules before advising authors.

## Positioning checks

- **Separate the networking novelty from the engineering effort.** What is new: a formulation, a
  bound/guarantee, a protocol/mechanism, a measurement finding, or an evidence regime nobody had
  covered? A faster implementation of a known scheme is not, by itself, an INFOCOM contribution.
- **Cover the networking lanes.** INFOCOM reviewers expect the flagships and the journals, not just
  the papers nearest your method (see the table). A bibliography missing the obvious sibling work
Back to top