Individual skill
dac-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering standard EDA benchmark suites (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet, OpenROAD flows), fair state-of-the-art baselines, QoR/PPA reporting with runtime, per-benchmark honesty, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and contamination-aware ML-for-EDA evaluation.
DAC-Skills/skills/dac-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- design Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,719 bytes
Read excerpt
# DAC Experiments
Use this before the November deadline when the evaluation is not yet locked. At DAC the evaluation
*is* the paper: reviewers are EDA practitioners who decide acceptance mostly on whether the **QoR
comparison is fair, standard, and reproducible**. The organizing principle is **measured design
quality against the strongest baseline on recognized benchmarks** — not novelty in the abstract.
## Evaluation audit
- **Use standard benchmark suites.** Match the suite to the task: **ISPD** placement/routing
contests, the **EPFL** combinational benchmark suite for logic synthesis, **ISCAS'85/'89** and
**ITC'99** for test/verification, the **TAU** contests for timing, **CircuitNet/OpenABC-D** and
similar for ML-for-EDA, and **OpenROAD / OpenROAD-flow-scripts** for full-flow experiments. A
private-benchmark-only evaluation is a scored weakness.