Individual skill
etp-literature-positioning
Use when staking the contribution of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript against the entrepreneurship frontier and its sibling journals (JBV, SEJ, AMJ, Research Policy).
Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,422 bytes
Read excerpt
# Literature Positioning (etp-literature-positioning)
## When to trigger
- The intro cites "the entrepreneurship literature" instead of a specific debate
- A reviewer says the contribution is "incremental" or "already known"
- You cannot say in one sentence what *changes* in the field if your paper is right
- The paper could be claimed by JBV, SEJ, or AMJ and you have not defended ETP as its home
- You are unsure which prior ETP/entrepreneurship work you must engage to be taken seriously
## Position inside a named entrepreneurship conversation
ETP reviewers are entrepreneurship specialists who know the canon.
Generic gap-spotting ("little research has examined X") reads as a desk-reject signal.