Individual skill
ssc-fit-positioning
Use when judging whether a manuscript is on-target for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) before investing in revision — screening for 思想分量 over technical sophistication, big-question level, cross-disciplinary reach, and original theory — and to recommend a better venue when fit is low. The most common save: stopping a niche empirical paper from being mis-submitted.
Social-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/ssc-fit-positioning/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,400
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,122 bytes
Read excerpt
# 匹配度判断(ssc-fit-positioning)
## 触发时机
- 还没动笔大改前,先问"这篇够不够格、对不对口"
- 稿子是漂亮的细分实证,但拿不准综合刊会不会要
- 学科叙事摇摆,不知道该不该冲
## 三道筛子(任一不过即高风险)
1. **问题层级**:问题立在国家发展 / 文明 / 制度 / 治理这一层级吗?还是某细分市场/行业的评估?
2. **原创理论**:本文提出了概念 / 命题 / 分析框架吗?还是在验证已有结论?
3. **思想 vs 技术**:贡献是"看清了某个思想问题",还是"方法/数据更新"?