Individual skill

ssc-fit-positioning

Use when judging whether a manuscript is on-target for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) before investing in revision — screening for 思想分量 over technical sophistication, big-question level, cross-disciplinary reach, and original theory — and to recommend a better venue when fit is low. The most common save: stopping a niche empirical paper from being mis-submitted.

Social-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/ssc-fit-positioning/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 匹配度判断(ssc-fit-positioning)

## 触发时机

- 还没动笔大改前,先问"这篇够不够格、对不对口"
- 稿子是漂亮的细分实证,但拿不准综合刊会不会要
- 学科叙事摇摆,不知道该不该冲

## 三道筛子(任一不过即高风险)

1. **问题层级**:问题立在国家发展 / 文明 / 制度 / 治理这一层级吗?还是某细分市场/行业的评估?
2. **原创理论**:本文提出了概念 / 命题 / 分析框架吗?还是在验证已有结论?
3. **思想 vs 技术**:贡献是"看清了某个思想问题",还是"方法/数据更新"?
Back to top