Individual skill
ssi-review-process
当需要理解《中国科学:信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的审稿流程、校准评审预期、判断作者在各环节的可行动空间时调用。覆盖编辑部初审→编委送外审→外审专家评议→复审→主编/编委会终审的链路、三审三校制度(报道级,以官网为准)、审稿原则(公平公正公开客观)、退修(大修/小修)与录用/退稿决定、90 天未获意见可改投的条款、审稿周期与轮次,以及与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 评审的异同。适用于投稿后到录用前的全过程校准。
Scientia-Sinica-Informationis-Skills/skills/ssi-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,885 bytes
Read excerpt
# 《中国科学:信息科学》审稿流程(Review Process)
理解《中国科学:信息科学》(SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, SSI) 的审稿流程,能帮助你校准
预期、在正确的环节使力。SSI 由《中国科学》杂志社出版,坚持**公平、公正、公开、客观**的
审稿原则;部分信源提及"三审三校"制度(**报道级,以官网当期说明为准**)。以下把流程拆解为
可操作的阶段,具体轮次与时限**以官网与退修/录用信为准(待核实)**,不臆造周期数字。
## 一、流程总览(典型中文期刊链路)
```text
投稿 → 编辑部初审(形式/范围/查重/学术规范)
→ 编委分派 → 外审专家评议(通常多位)
→ 作者退修(大修/小修)→ 修改稿再审
→ 复审 / 编委意见