Individual skill
emnlp-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of an EMNLP paper — baseline fairness and tuning budgets, dataset and language coverage matched to claims, contamination audits for pretrained and API models, significance testing and seed variance, human evaluation protocols, prompt sensitivity, and the error analysis EMNLP reviewers expect.
EMNLP-Skills/skills/emnlp-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- testing Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,631 bytes
Read excerpt
# EMNLP Experiments
Use this while the experimental grid is still cheap to change. EMNLP's reviewing culture
was partly built by papers criticizing NLP's own evaluation habits, so the venue audits
experiments the way a security reviewer audits inputs: assume the design will be probed
for the easiest way to make the headline number lie.
## The five probes reviewers run
1. **Baseline fairness.** Did the comparison systems get the same tuning budget, data,
and prompt engineering effort as yours? A win over an under-tuned baseline is the
most common EMNLP soundness objection.
2. **Coverage-claim match.** Do the datasets, domains, and languages span the claim?
English-only evidence supports English-only sentences.