Individual skill

ppopp-review-process

Use when reasoning about how a PPoPP submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the Program Committee plus External/Extended Review Committee model, TPMS reviewer matching, the author-response rebuttal, the accept/reject decision with automatic poster consideration, and how PPoPP's process differs from PLDI's and CGO's.

PPoPP-Skills/skills/ppopp-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# PPoPP Review Process

Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. PPoPP runs a **single-round, double-blind
conference review** with a **scheduled author-response rebuttal** and an unusual safety net:
papers not accepted for a talk are **automatically considered for posters**. The most consequential
mental shift for authors arriving from a journal-style venue is that there is (as verified) no
guaranteed revise-and-resubmit round — the rebuttal is your one written turn, so it must land.

## Process model

- Submission and review run on **HotCRP** with **double-blind** anonymity: author identities are
  hidden from reviewers and reviewer identities from authors.
- Papers are read by the **Program Committee** and an **External/Extended Review Committee (ERC)**;
  declare conflicts against **both** pools. Reviewer assignment may use the **Toronto Paper Matching
Back to top