Individual skill
ppopp-review-process
Use when reasoning about how a PPoPP submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the Program Committee plus External/Extended Review Committee model, TPMS reviewer matching, the author-response rebuttal, the accept/reject decision with automatic poster consideration, and how PPoPP's process differs from PLDI's and CGO's.
PPoPP-Skills/skills/ppopp-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,510 bytes
Read excerpt
# PPoPP Review Process
Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. PPoPP runs a **single-round, double-blind
conference review** with a **scheduled author-response rebuttal** and an unusual safety net:
papers not accepted for a talk are **automatically considered for posters**. The most consequential
mental shift for authors arriving from a journal-style venue is that there is (as verified) no
guaranteed revise-and-resubmit round — the rebuttal is your one written turn, so it must land.
## Process model
- Submission and review run on **HotCRP** with **double-blind** anonymity: author identities are
hidden from reviewers and reviewer identities from authors.
- Papers are read by the **Program Committee** and an **External/Extended Review Committee (ERC)**;
declare conflicts against **both** pools. Reviewer assignment may use the **Toronto Paper Matching