Individual skill
ssc-evidence
Use when handling empirical evidence in a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — choosing among quantitative, qualitative, and historical-comparative methods so the method serves the proposition, and translating any analysis (including regressions) into a thesis-level finding rather than a coefficient dump. Use when evidence feels disconnected from the argument or reads as method-flexing.
Social-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/ssc-evidence/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,980 bytes
Read excerpt
# 经验证据(ssc-evidence)
## 触发时机
- 经验材料堆在那里,但没回扣命题
- 用了高级方法却讲不出"它帮我们看清了什么思想问题"
- 纠结该用定量、定性还是历史比较
## 第一原则:方法服务于论题
本刊**方法多元、不偏好某一种**。计量只是证据之一,**不能替代理论论证**。任何方法都要被翻译成"它如何支撑/检验核心命题"。
## 选择证据形态