Individual skill

ssc-evidence

Use when handling empirical evidence in a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — choosing among quantitative, qualitative, and historical-comparative methods so the method serves the proposition, and translating any analysis (including regressions) into a thesis-level finding rather than a coefficient dump. Use when evidence feels disconnected from the argument or reads as method-flexing.

Social-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/ssc-evidence/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 经验证据(ssc-evidence)

## 触发时机

- 经验材料堆在那里,但没回扣命题
- 用了高级方法却讲不出"它帮我们看清了什么思想问题"
- 纠结该用定量、定性还是历史比较

## 第一原则:方法服务于论题

本刊**方法多元、不偏好某一种**。计量只是证据之一,**不能替代理论论证**。任何方法都要被翻译成"它如何支撑/检验核心命题"。

## 选择证据形态
Back to top