Individual skill

acmmm-review-process

Use when reasoning about the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) review pipeline — thematic-area routing to reviewers and area chairs, the OpenReview double-blind process and its single-blind track exceptions, the optional anonymous rebuttal, the meta-review and decision, and the oral/poster and award tiers, and where an author actually has leverage.

ACM-MM-Skills/skills/acmmm-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD: Yes
Scanner rules are current: Yes
Repository scan complete: No
Skill scan complete: Yes
Observed behavior: Network or broad shell
Last checked: Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings): 1,400
Repository last updated: Sep 27, 2026
License: MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

academic-writing Repository topic
agent-skills Repository topic
journal Repository topic
academic-research Repository topic
ai-agents Repository topic
anthropic Repository topic
awesome-list Repository topic
claude Repository topic
claude-code Repository topic
economics Repository topic
operations Derived category

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files

SKILL.mdcore · 4,541 bytes

Read excerpt


# ACM MM Review Process

Use this to build an accurate mental model of how an ACM Multimedia paper is judged, so
strategy targets the points where an author can move the outcome and not the points where they
cannot.

## The pipeline

1. **Submission + thematic area.** The paper enters OpenReview under a chosen thematic area,
   which routes it to a matching reviewer pool and area chair.
2. **Assignment.** Reviewers and an AC are assigned; a mismatched thematic area is where papers
   get reviewers who cannot judge the contribution.
3. **Reviews.** Reviewers assess novelty, cross-modal soundness, evidence (including user
   studies where relevant), and reproducibility.