Individual skill
ccs-reproducibility
Use when strengthening ACM CCS reproducibility evidence, including the artifact-availability posture, threat-model-to-evidence mapping, attack reproduction steps, defense overhead measurement, measurement-dataset provenance, environment and version pinning, and honest justification when artifacts cannot be shared.
ACM-CCS-Skills/skills/ccs-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,618 bytes
Read excerpt
# CCS Reproducibility
Use this before submission and again before the artifact-evaluation deadline. Reopen the
current CFP and call for artifacts to confirm what availability statement and packaging CCS
expects this cycle.
## Evidence map
- Map each security claim — every attack, defense guarantee, and measurement result — to a
verifiable location: a script, a config, a dataset, a proof, or a logged run.
- For attacks, record the target's exact version and configuration, the attacker's resource
budget, and the sequence of steps that reproduce the exploit.
- For defenses, record the workload, the overhead-measurement method, the hardware, and the
adaptive attacker used, so the cost-versus-security tradeoff can be rechecked.