Individual skill

revedres-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising prose, the 150-word abstract, and the introduction in the Review of Educational Research (RER) synthesizing voice and APA 7 style. Lands the integrative voice; it does not build the analytic spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or design exhibits (revedres-tables-figures).

Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-writing-style/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Writing Style (revedres-writing-style)

## When to trigger

- The framework and exhibits are settled and the prose needs to match the RER bar
- A draft summarizes study-by-study instead of synthesizing across studies
- The abstract is over 150 words or reads like a primary-research abstract
- The introduction buries the contribution or over-signposts

## The RER voice: synthesize, do not summarize, for a broad education audience

RER is read **across education and adjacent disciplines**, not by one method club. The voice is **comprehensive, critical, and integrative**: authoritative about the field, fair to every camp, and accessible to a reader who does not already know this literature. The single most-punished move is **prose that walks through one study per paragraph** — "Smith (2019) found… Jones (2020) found…" — which is summary, not synthesis. Instead, organize paragraphs around **claims, constructs, and tensions**, citing clusters of studies as evidence for each.

## The introduction arc
Back to top