Individual skill
imfer-referee-strategy
Use when anticipating the objections a dual academic/policy IMF Economic Review (IMFER) referee will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense; it does not draft the response letter (imfer-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).
IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-referee-strategy/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,610 bytes
Read excerpt
# Referee Strategy (imfer-referee-strategy)
## When to trigger
- The paper is near submission and you want to stress-test it against the referees it will draw
- You must decide which robustness/identification checks to run *before* submitting vs. hold in reserve
- An R&R arrived and you must map referee concerns to concrete responses
- You want to understand how IMFER's double-blind, dual-audience review shapes strategy
## How IMFER review works (plan around it)
IMFER uses **double-blind review** through Editorial Manager (anonymize the main file and self-citations) (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). The distinctive feature is the **referee pool**: typically one frontier international-macro researcher *and* readers attuned to **policy relevance and IMF-program realism**. The modal report attacks (1) the **credibility of the cross-country / policy-surprise design**, then (2) **country composition and external validity**, then (3) **whether the policy implication is actually warranted**. A clean estimate with an over-reached or under-developed policy claim is a common rejection. Plan to **pre-empt the predictable objections in the paper** and reserve the letter for genuinely new asks.
| Referee objection (by type) | Pre-emption to build in now |