Menu

Individual skill

conext-author-response

0upvotes

Use when drafting ACM CoNEXT author responses, covering the initial-review rebuttal and — distinctively — the one-shot "major" revision response letter that must stay double-anonymous, map every "minimum necessary change" to a concrete tracked edit, and survive a single re-review by the original reviewers and a shepherd under PACMNET.

CoNEXT-Skills/skills/conext-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# CoNEXT Author Response

Use this after CoNEXT reviews are released. CoNEXT has **two distinct speaking turns**, and
conflating them is a common mistake: a short initial rebuttal, and — if you receive a **one-shot
major revision** — a full, journal-style **response letter** accompanying a revised paper that the
original reviewers re-read exactly once. Both must respect double-anonymity: the letter itself must
not reveal authors, institutions, testbeds, or repository ownership.

## Triage (both turns)

- Answer what affects the decision: significance, soundness, measurement quality, baseline fairness,
  clarity, and reproducibility.
- Use evidence that already exists or that the revision will concretely add — never a vague promise.
- Correct factual misreadings first; a reviewer who misread a figure or a testbed setup is often
Back to top