Individual skill
lang-review-process
Use when anticipating how a Language (LSA) manuscript will be judged — the double-anonymous review, the general-audience and cross-framework bar, the desk-return filters (descriptive data dump, single-framework parochialism, undocumented data), and the decision categories. Sets expectations and stress-tests before submission; it does not write the paper.
Language-Linguistic-Society-Skills/skills/lang-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# Review Process (lang-review-process)
Knowing how *Language* actually evaluates a manuscript lets you pre-empt the objections before you
submit. *Language* runs **double-anonymous** review under co-editors and an editorial team, drawing
referees from **across subfields**, and it screens hard at intake: a paper that is a **descriptive data
dump**, that lives **inside one framework**, or that rests on **undocumented data** may be returned
before external review. This skill maps the process and stress-tests the paper against it.
## When to trigger
- Before submission, to predict reviewer objections and the likely outcome
- After a decision letter, to read the outcome category correctly (then route to `lang-rebuttal`)
- Deciding whether the piece fits a full article or a shorter/online section
- Calibrating expectations for a first-round outcome