Individual skill
nbr-theory-gap
Use to articulate the theoretical gap and contribution for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — turning a set of construct relationships into a statement of what existing management theory cannot explain and what this paper adds (concept / proposition / framework / boundary condition). Use when the contribution still reads as "we test whether X affects Y".
Nankai-Business-Review-Skills/skills/nbr-theory-gap/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,400
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- testing Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,648 bytes
Read excerpt
# 理论缺口与贡献(nbr-theory-gap)
## 触发时机
- 引言只说"X 与 Y 的关系研究不足",没说清缺口
- 贡献写成"本文检验了 X 对 Y 的影响"
- 自评/评审:"只是验证了已有理论"
## 缺口的三种合格类型
1. **解释缺口**:现有理论解释不了某个反常现象/分歧结论
2. **机制缺口**:知道 X→Y,但**为什么/何时**成立的黑箱未打开(中介/调节)
3. **整合/边界缺口**:两套理论冲突需整合,或某理论的适用边界未明