Individual skill
icdm-review-process
Use when reasoning about the ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) review machinery - the triple-blind mechanics, the Accept / Accept-as-Short / Reject outcome space, the mixed data-mining reviewer pool, PC Co-Chair decision-making, the traditional no-rebuttal posture, and how to read an ICDM decision packet.
ICDM-Skills/skills/icdm-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,457 bytes
Read excerpt
# ICDM Review Process
Understand how ICDM decisions are actually made, so you can write for the process and read the
outcome correctly. ICDM's Research Track runs a **triple-blind** review, has a distinctive
**short-paper** outcome, and traditionally offers **no author rebuttal** — a very different shape
from OpenReview venues with public discussion.
## Triple-blind mechanics
- Author identities and referee identities are both concealed. Since 2011, referee names are
hidden even from each other during discussion; only the **PC Co-Chairs** know who is who.
- Author names are disclosed **only after ranking and acceptance are finalized** — so nothing in
the review can be swayed by who you are, for better or worse.
- Practical consequence: the paper is judged purely on the anonymized PDF and its cited