Individual skill

oopsla-experiments

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OOPSLA paper — matching evidence type to claim type across the venue's spread (benchmarks, corpus studies, case studies, user studies, mechanized proofs), building baselines and workloads that survive the SIGPLAN checklist, and sizing experiments to the round calendar.

OOPSLA-Skills/skills/oopsla-experiments/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# OOPSLA Experiments

OOPSLA's evaluation question is not "is there a big table?" but "does the
evidence *type* match the claim *type*?" The venue's published scope runs
from mathematical formalisms to empirical studies, and its exemplars span
benchmark suites, measurement methodology, corpus mining, and language
experience reports (`resources/exemplars/library.md`) — so the first design
act is choosing the right instrument, and the second is executing it to the
SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines standard that reviewers apply
checklist-in-hand (`oopsla-reproducibility` operationalizes the pillars).

## Claim-type → evidence-type routing

| Claim type | Primary evidence | Common OOPSLA failure |
Back to top