Individual skill
jams-review-process
Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jams-rebuttal).
Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- marketing Derived category
- operations Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,485 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process (jams-review-process)
## When to trigger
- Before submitting, to set realistic expectations about JAMS review
- A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it before responding
- You are unsure who decides at JAMS and what reviewers are told to weigh
- You want to know what conditional acceptance triggers (data/code deposit)
## How JAMS review works
- **Double-anonymized.** Authors and reviewers are concealed from each other; keep every round anonymized, including revised files and any preregistration links.
- **Developmental philosophy.** JAMS, like the AMS journals, runs a **developmental review** — area editors and reviewers aim to improve promising papers across rounds, not merely gatekeep. A well-run R&R is the realistic best case; first-round acceptance is essentially unheard of.
- **Decision structure.** Manuscripts are handled by an **Area / Associate Editor** under the Co-Editors-in-Chief (Stephanie M. Noble and Charles H. Noble, University of Tennessee, since June 2024 — verified 2026-06-22; re-verify the masthead before submission). Your keyword/area choices in Editorial Manager influence routing, so choose them to reach the right editor and reviewers.