Individual skill

icassp-review-process

Use when reasoning about ICASSP peer review — the IEEE Signal Processing Society technical-committee pipeline, EDICS-based assignment, single-blind reviewing, the recently added short rebuttal, oral-versus-poster allocation, the roughly-even acceptance rate, and how a signal-processing decision is actually made and should be decoded.

ICASSP-Skills/skills/icassp-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ICASSP Review Process

Use this to reason about review-stage strategy. Reopen the current call, paper kit, and IEEE SPS
editorial and reviewer guidelines before making process claims, because the mechanics shift by
cycle and are governed by the Signal Processing Society, not by a standing program.

## Process model

- ICASSP review is organized by the **IEEE Signal Processing Society** through its **technical
  committees**; papers are routed by the **EDICS** subject category you select at submission.
- Review is **single-blind**: reviewers see author identities; authors do not see reviewers.
- Reviewers assess technical correctness, novelty and significance to the signal-processing
  community, experimental soundness with task-appropriate metrics, clarity in four pages, and
  reproducibility.
Back to top