Individual skill

colt-experiments

Use when deciding whether a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs numerical content at all — COLT has no experiments requirement — and, when numerics genuinely help, designing small illustrative simulations that visualize a proved bound, a separation, or a phase transition without diluting the theory.

COLT-Skills/skills/colt-experiments/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,410
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# COLT Experiments

Start from the venue truth: **COLT imposes no experiments requirement, and most COLT
papers contain no experiments.** The 2026 CFP (checked 2026-07-08) asks for
theoretical machine-learning contributions and mentions no empirical-evaluation
expectation; papers are accepted on theorems. The decision this skill supports is
therefore *whether* to include numerics, and only then *how*.

## Should this paper contain numerics at all?

| Situation | Include numerics? | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Clean upper/lower bound pair, standard model | No | Plots add length, not belief |
| New algorithm whose practicality is part of the pitch | Small illustration | Shows the constants are not absurd |
Back to top