Individual skill

cav-writing-style

Use when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.

CAV-Skills/skills/cav-writing-style/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# CAV Writing Style

Use this when revising the main paper. CAV papers are Springer LNCS chapters read by verification
researchers, so they need a **precise verification contribution stated on the first page** and a
**formal guarantee** a reviewer can check. The failure this skill prevents is a technically fine
paper that reads like a systems demo or a heuristic with a benchmark table but no stated property.

## Revision rules

- **Lead with the verification contribution and its guarantee:** the problem (what property, of what
  system), why current methods fall short, the contribution (technique and/or tool), **what is
  formally guaranteed** (soundness, completeness, an equisatisfiability/refinement claim), the
  benchmark evidence, and the scope.
- **State the formal claim precisely.** Name the property, the assumptions, and the theorem. A paper
Back to top