Individual skill

imfer-literature-positioning

Use when the contribution of an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript relative to the international-macro frontier and the sibling journals is unclear or undersold. Stakes the claim against JIE/JIMF/JMCB and the IMF research stream; it does not select the topic (imfer-topic-selection) or design identification (imfer-identification).

IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-literature-positioning/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Literature Positioning (imfer-literature-positioning)

## When to trigger

- A referee or coauthor says "I am not sure what is new here relative to [JIE / JIMF paper]"
- The paper cites broadly but never states the **one-sentence delta** over the closest prior work
- You cannot tell whether the contribution is empirical (new fact), methodological, or policy-design
- The framing reads like a JIE or JIMF paper and you must pull it toward IMFER's policy-relevant frontier
- You need to place the paper in the **IMF research stream** (WEO/GFSR themes, ARC topics, prior IMFER issues) without name-dropping
- A reviewer suspects the result restates a known global-financial-cycle / sudden-stop finding under a new label

## How IMFER weighs a contribution

IMFER referees ask three things at once: *Is the finding new at the frontier? Is the identification credible? Does it change how a policymaker should think about an international-macro problem?* A paper that is new but policy-mute, or policy-relevant but already known, stalls. Position the contribution on the axis where it is strongest, and be explicit about the **closest two or three papers** — including the sibling-journal ones — so the referee never has to guess what you are adding.
Back to top