Individual skill
jpube-review-process
Use when you need to understand or plan around the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE / JPubEc) editorial process — single anonymized review with a minimum of two reviewers, the Editorial Manager workflow, the Hendren–Kopczuk editorial leadership, SSRN preprint option, and the one-appeal policy. Explains the process; for the final file check use jpube-submission.
Journal-of-Public-Economics-Skills/skills/jpube-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,393
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# Review Process (jpube-review-process)
## When to trigger
- You want to know what happens after you press submit at JPubE
- You are deciding whether to post an SSRN preprint at submission
- You need to plan timelines and expectations around the review model
- A decision arrived and you are weighing whether to appeal
## How JPubE review works (verified facts)
- **Single anonymized review.** Reviewers' identities are hidden from authors, but **authors' identities are known to reviewers and editors**. This is *not* double-anonymized — do not strip your name from the manuscript expecting blind review; write knowing referees see who you are. (Contrast: some venues use double-anonymized review.)
- **Minimum of two reviewers.** Suitable submissions are typically sent to at least two reviewers; expect substantive, specialist public-finance reports.
- **Editorial leadership.** The current ScienceDirect masthead lists **Editors Nathaniel Hendren (MIT)** and **Wojciech Kopczuk (Columbia)**, supported by co-editors and advisory editors. A handling editor manages your manuscript and synthesizes the reports into the decision.