Individual skill

the-philosophical-review

Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# The Philosophical Review (the-philosophical-review)

## Journal positioning

The Philosophical Review is one of the most selective generalist journals in analytic
philosophy, publishing full-length articles of the highest quality across all core
areas — metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind and language, ethics, and the
history of philosophy treated philosophically. Its defining expectation is a
**rigorous, original argument** that advances a live debate: a clearly stated thesis,
a valid and carefully defended line of reasoning, and decisive engagement with the
strongest opposing positions. A competent survey, a small variation on a known move,
or a paper that does not engage the best objections is a poor fit. This skill is a
**fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid. It does not replace the journal's current
submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Philosophical Review author
Back to top