Individual skill

arecon-literature-synthesis

Use when systematically gathering, reading, and synthesizing a body of economic research for an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review — coverage discipline and avoiding citation gaps. Builds the evidence corpus and synthesis notes; it does not impose the analytical spine (arecon-organizing-framework) or appraise study credibility (arecon-evidence-standards).

Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Literature Synthesis (arecon-literature-synthesis)

## When to trigger

- The invitation is secured and it is time to read the field thoroughly
- Reading feels unsystematic; you fear missing important contributions an adjacent economist would expect
- You have many papers but no way to weigh, compare, or reconcile their findings
- A Committee referee is likely to ask "why did you omit X / the Y literature?"

## Coverage discipline: read the field, not a convenience sample

An ARE review's credibility rests on the reader's belief that you read **everything that matters** — and ARE referees are often the very authors whose work is being weighed, so gaps are noticed. Build coverage systematically rather than from memory:

1. **Seed set.** Start from the pitch's key references and the field's canonical pieces.
Back to top