Individual skill
Management Presentation Review
Reviews a management presentation for what it omits -- moved metric definitions, cohorts that stopped being shown, bridges that do not tie -- when you need the questions to ask in the session itself.
packs/private-equity/skills/management-presentation-review/SKILL.md
Source commit e19bba60ec18203161854532f283a19023c20d3d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
Standard SKILL.md format has not been attested at this commit. No installation command is available; inspect the source.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 25
- Repository last updated
- Sep 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- dcf Repository topic
- finance Repository topic
- investment-banking Repository topic
- lbo Repository topic
- private-equity Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,588 bytes
Read excerpt
# Management Presentation Review
## When to use
Use this skill on receipt of the management presentation and before the session is held, and again when a second-round deck must be diffed against the first. The deck is a sales document from the adviser who wrote the CIM: the disclosed numbers have been vendor-checked, so the signal is in what was dropped.
## What it does
Produces a review organised around omission: a page-by-page diff against the CIM, a register of metric definitions that moved, the cohorts that stopped being shown, a bridge tie-out, a realised-versus-annualised EBITDA restatement, and a three-tier question list for the session, the data room and what to hold back.
## Method
### Step 1 -- Diff the deck against the CIM, page by page
