Individual skill

Investment Committee Q&A

Produces a ranked IC question bank with a written answer to each and a conditions slate for the objections better met with a condition than a defence, when you need the session to test the deal rather than the presenter.

packs/private-equity/skills/investment-committee-qa/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit e19bba60ec18203161854532f283a19023c20d3d

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

Standard SKILL.md format has not been attested at this commit. No installation command is available; inspect the source.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
25
Repository last updated
Sep 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Investment Committee Q&A

## When to use

Use this skill in the 48-72 hours between circulating the IC memo and the committee session. The memo makes the argument; this prepares the interrogation of it. It applies to a first approval, a re-approval after a price move, and follow-on capital requests. Use it especially when the team is confident, because confidence is the condition under which answers get invented in the room.

## What it does

Produces a question bank ranked by return impact, a written answer to each, a labelled list of the questions to which there is no good answer, a pre-agreed conditions slate, and a speaking plan for who answers what.

## Method

1. **Read the memo as an adversary.** Mark every number that moves the return and every sentence that hedges. The recurring three: the QoE haircut, the credibility of the growth bridge, and the exit multiple.
2. **Rank by return impact, not by likelihood of being asked.** State how much MOIC and IRR turn on each answer. A question worth 0.4x of MOIC is prepared before one worth 0.05x, whatever this committee habitually asks.
Back to top