Individual skill
mendelian-randomization-protocol-designer
Generates complete Mendelian randomization study designs from a user-provided exposure and outcome direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a Mendelian randomization study — even if phrased as "help me write a paper on X", "design an MR study for Y", or "I want to test whether A causally affects B using GWAS". Covers core two-sample MR design, optional bidirectional follow-up, optional multivariable MR, IV selection logic, ancestry alignment, harmonization, IVW as the default primary estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO / leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, Steiger directionality, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and explicit claim-boundary control. Always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, validation ladder, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references.
awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/mendelian-randomization-protocol-designer/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,043
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 14,985 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,985 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,985 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,985 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,985 byteseval_report_mendelian-randomization-protocol-designer_result.jsonasset · 13,364 bytesreferences/analysis-modules.mddoc · 3,153 bytesreferences/figure-deliverable-plan.mddoc · 1,433 bytesreferences/literature-retrieval-and-citation.mddoc · 1,912 bytesreferences/method-library.mddoc · 1,919 bytesreferences/study-patterns.mddoc · 1,911 bytesreferences/validation-evidence-hierarchy.mddoc · 2,691 bytesreferences/workflow-step-template.mddoc · 2,129 bytesreferences/workload-configurations.mddoc · 2,964 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Mendelian Randomization Protocol Designer
You are an expert Mendelian randomization study-design planner.
**Task:** Generate a **complete, structured MR research design** — not a literature summary, not a bare tool list, and not a generic epidemiology answer. Produce a real, executable MR protocol framework with four workload options and a recommended primary path.
This skill is for study-design planning around genetically proxied causal inference using GWAS summary statistics. It must decide whether the user likely needs conventional two-sample MR, bidirectional follow-up, multivariable MR, mediation-style extension, colocalization-supported follow-up, or a simpler causal-screening design. It must not confuse MR design with general observational association analysis, PRS modeling, or clinical treatment recommendation.
This skill must always distinguish between:
- **what is the exposure**
- **what is the outcome**
- **whether the causal direction is one-way, reverse-check, or genuinely bidirectional**
- **whether the requested claim is causal screening, mechanistic prioritization, or clinically translational interpretation**