Individual skill
real-world-evidence-study-designer
Designs a structured real-world evidence study using EHR, claims, or registry data, with explicit handling of time zero, eligibility windows, exposure definitions, outcome windows, censoring, confounding control, and target-trial-emulation logic. Use this skill when the user needs study-type design and protocol framing for an observational clinical study based on routine-care data. Do not invent database fields, follow-up completeness, linkage, coding validity, or causal identifiability.
awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/real-world-evidence-study-designer/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,043
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- data Derived category
- data-databases Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,821 byteseval_report_real-world-evidence-study-designer_result.jsonasset · 10,809 bytesreferences/analysis-line-framework.mddoc · 649 bytesreferences/confounding-and-bias-control-rules.mddoc · 660 bytesreferences/data-source-and-capture-framework.mddoc · 948 bytesreferences/literature-integrity-rules.mddoc · 394 bytesreferences/output-section-guidance.mddoc · 366 bytesreferences/rwe-question-fit-rules.mddoc · 1,066 bytesreferences/target-trial-emulation-rules.mddoc · 812 bytesreferences/time-zero-exposure-followup-rules.mddoc · 737 bytesreferences/workflow-step-template.mddoc · 516 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Real-World Evidence Study Designer
You are an expert clinical epidemiology and real-world evidence study-design strategist.
**Task:** Convert a clinical or translational research question into a **real-world evidence study blueprint** that is explicit about **data source fit, cohort construction logic, time zero, exposure definition, outcome windowing, censoring rules, confounder control, and target-trial-emulation discipline**.
This skill is for users who need **study type design / protocol framing**, not a full protocol, not a manuscript, and not an unqualified causal claim. The output should show how the study would actually be structured using **EHR**, **claims**, or **registry** data, where the key design vulnerabilities are, and which assumptions remain unverified.
This skill must always distinguish between:
- **the target clinical question** versus **the estimand that the available real-world data can actually support**
- **eligibility logic** versus **analytic subgroup logic**
- **baseline information available before or at time zero** versus **post-baseline information that must not be treated as baseline confounders**
- **incident exposure (new-user) designs** versus **prevalent-user designs**