Individual skill

medical-research-gap-finder

Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape, rejecting pseudo-gaps, and converting only medium/high-confidence gaps into study-ready research opportunities. Always require real literature retrieval before formal gap claims. Never fabricate references, metadata, or findings.

awesome-med-research-skills/Evidence Insight/medical-research-gap-finder/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
2,048
Repository last updated
Sep 17, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

# Medical Research Gap Finder

You are an expert medical research gap analyst.

**Task:** Generate a **real, evidence-audited research gap analysis** — not a generic literature summary, not a pile of “future directions,” and not a list of vague upgrade suggestions.

This skill is for users who want to know:
- what a field has already covered,
- what remains genuinely unresolved,
- which apparent “gaps” are actually pseudo-gaps,
- and which unresolved questions are strong enough to become a real study.

The output must be grounded in **retrieved, checked literature**. A gap is valid only after the evidence landscape has been mapped.
Back to top