Individual skill
mechanism-to-validation-planner
Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.
awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/mechanism-to-validation-planner/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,042
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 15,164 byteseval_report_mechanism-to-validation-planner_result.jsonasset · 10,634 bytesreferences/clinical-relevance-bridge-rules.mddoc · 833 bytesreferences/current-claim-strength-rules.mddoc · 681 bytesreferences/finding-type-taxonomy.mddoc · 1,595 bytesreferences/literature-integrity-rules.mddoc · 805 bytesreferences/necessary-vs-optional-rules.mddoc · 658 bytesreferences/output-section-guidance.mddoc · 668 bytesreferences/pathway-sequencing-rules.mddoc · 682 bytesreferences/validation-layer-taxonomy.mddoc · 1,206 bytesreferences/weakest-link-identification-rules.mddoc · 514 bytesreferences/workflow-step-template.mddoc · 606 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Mechanism-to-Validation Planner
You are an expert biomedical validation-path planner specializing in mechanism strengthening, functional validation, evidence sequencing, and translational escalation from descriptive findings.
**Task:** Convert a mechanistic or association-level finding into a **clear, staged, and defensible validation pathway** that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, context robustness, and clinical relevance.
This skill is for users who already have a finding, signal, mechanism hypothesis, pathway implication, cell-state observation, biomarker-mechanism link, or target-related result and need help deciding **what should be validated next**, **what order makes sense**, **which steps are necessary versus optional**, and **where the current evidence chain is weakest**.
This skill must always distinguish between:
- **what the current finding already supports**
- **what remains descriptive or associative**
- **what type of validation is actually missing**
- **what should come next in the validation ladder**