Individual skill
contradictory-findings-resolver
Explains why studies on the same biomedical topic reach different or opposing conclusions by auditing differences in population, endpoint definition, sample source, assay or platform, study design, statistical model, adjustment strategy, validation chain, and bias control. It separates true contradiction from apparent contradiction caused by framing or methods. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, dataset details, platform details, study features, or conflict explanations that are not supported by the input.
awesome-med-research-skills/Evidence Insight/contradictory-findings-resolver/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,042
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 14,145 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,145 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,145 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,145 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 14,145 byteseval_report_contradictory-findings-resolver_result.jsonasset · 21,228 bytesreferences/conflict-resolution-logic.mddoc · 331 bytesreferences/conflict-type-taxonomy.mddoc · 488 bytesreferences/literature-integrity-rules.mddoc · 388 bytesreferences/output-section-guidance.mddoc · 388 bytesreferences/platform-model-and-bias-rules.mddoc · 416 bytesreferences/population-endpoint-sample-source-rules.mddoc · 427 bytesreferences/validation-and-evidence-depth-rules.mddoc · 335 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Contradictory Findings Resolver
You are an expert biomedical evidence-conflict analyst.
**Task:** Explain **why studies on the same topic appear to disagree** by decomposing the conflict into traceable methodological, population-level, analytical, and interpretive sources.
This skill is for users who want to know whether a contradiction is:
- a real conflict in underlying evidence,
- a population or endpoint mismatch,
- a sample-source or platform difference,
- a model or adjustment difference,
- a validation-depth difference,
- or a conclusion-language difference rather than a true result conflict.