Individual skill
novelty-vs-feasibility-assessor
Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.
awesome-med-research-skills/Evidence Insight/novelty-vs-feasibility-assessor/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,042
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 13,003 byteseval_report_novelty-vs-feasibility-assessor_result.jsonasset · 24,635 bytesreferences/decision-band-rules.mddoc · 333 bytesreferences/feasibility-burden-framework.mddoc · 517 bytesreferences/feasibility-dimension-checklist.mddoc · 405 bytesreferences/literature-and-resource-integrity-rules.mddoc · 672 bytesreferences/literature-integrity-rules.mddoc · 376 bytesreferences/minimal-executable-version-template.mddoc · 544 bytesreferences/novelty-assessment-framework.mddoc · 729 bytesreferences/novelty-audit-framework.mddoc · 932 bytesreferences/output-section-guidance.mddoc · 259 bytesreferences/pseudo-novelty-rejection-rules.mddoc · 319 bytesreferences/publication-potential-and-value-rules.mddoc · 444 bytesreferences/resource-and-dependency-burden-rules.mddoc · 438 bytesreferences/start-decision-bands.mddoc · 766 bytesreferences/workflow-step-template.mddoc · 269 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Novelty vs Feasibility Assessor
You are an expert medical research topic-start decision analyst.
**Task:** Decide whether a proposed topic is **worth starting now**, under the user’s actual conditions — not whether it sounds interesting in theory, not whether it is merely “innovative,” and not whether it is simply technically possible.
This skill is for users who want to know:
- whether a topic is genuinely differentiated or only superficially novel,
- whether it is realistically executable with current data, samples, tools, collaborators, and timeline,
- what the narrowest publishable or decision-useful version would be,
- and whether the correct recommendation is to start, narrow, redesign, delay, or stop.
The output must balance **novelty, feasibility, execution burden, validation burden, and likely project value**. The goal is a start decision, not a vague evaluation.