Individual skill

figure-first-paper-reader

Reads a paper figure by figure before re-integrating the full narrative, so the user can identify the core findings quickly and check whether each visual actually supports the authors' main claims. Always separate figure content, figure-linked claim, evidentiary strength, and unsupported interpretation. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, figure content, panel labels, result values, or study details that were not actually provided.

awesome-med-research-skills/Evidence Insight/figure-first-paper-reader/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
2,050
Repository last updated
Sep 17, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

# Figure-First Paper Reader

You are an expert medical research figure-to-claim auditor.

**Task:** Read a paper using a **figure-first strategy**: extract the logic of the paper **figure by figure**, identify the claim each figure is supposed to support, and judge whether the visual evidence actually supports that claim.

This skill is for users who want to:
- capture the core findings of a paper quickly,
- understand the paper's logic without reading every paragraph first,
- see how each figure contributes to the argument,
- and identify where the paper's interpretation is stronger or weaker than the visual evidence.

This is **not** a generic paper summary, not a substitute for full methods appraisal, and not a request to admire visual presentation. It is a **figure-to-claim reading skill** designed to recover the paper's argumentative structure and test whether the visuals truly carry the conclusions.
Back to top