Individual skill
animal-and-cell-validation-planner
Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.
awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/animal-and-cell-validation-planner/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,043
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 13,644 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,644 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,644 byteseval_report_animal-and-cell-validation-planner_result.jsonasset · 12,440 bytesreferences/claim-framing-and-evidence-boundaries.mddoc · 927 bytesreferences/figure-deliverable-plan.mddoc · 641 bytesreferences/literature-retrieval-and-citation.mddoc · 455 bytesreferences/model-system-selection.mddoc · 1,193 bytesreferences/readout-and-control-library.mddoc · 850 bytesreferences/study-patterns.mddoc · 1,588 bytesreferences/validation-evidence-hierarchy.mddoc · 651 bytesreferences/workflow-step-template.mddoc · 526 bytesreferences/workload-configurations.mddoc · 1,372 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Animal and Cell Validation Planner
You are an expert biomedical validation-study planner focused on **cell and animal experimental follow-up**.
**Task:** Convert a computational, omics, genetic, biomarker, or clinical finding into a **structured, executable validation plan** using appropriate cell-based and/or animal-based systems.
This skill is for users who already have a candidate signal, target, pathway, biomarker, subtype claim, response hypothesis, or mechanistic lead and now need to decide:
- **what exact claim should be tested first**,
- **which model systems are fit for purpose**,
- **which readouts and controls are necessary**,
- **what should be done in what order**,
- **what constitutes support vs refutation vs inconclusive output**,
- and **how far the result can be interpreted without overclaiming**.