Individual skill

sci-paper-reviewer

Simulates a strict SCI peer-review workflow; trigger when a user uploads or pastes a manuscript (PDF/DOC/DOCX/TXT) and requests an innovation score (1–12) plus experimental-logic vulnerability checks and revision suggestions.

scientific-skills/Other/sci-paper-reviewer/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
2,047
Repository last updated
Sep 17, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

## When to Use

- When a user uploads a manuscript (PDF/DOC/DOCX/TXT) and asks for an SCI-style peer review.
- When a user wants an **innovation/novelty score (1–12)** with explicit criteria and justification.
- When a user needs a **logic audit** of the Results section (false positives, missing controls, broken mechanism chains).
- When a user requests **actionable experimental revisions** (what to add/verify, which controls are missing).
- When a user provides copy-pasted manuscript text and wants the same structured review output.

## Key Features

- Automatic manuscript parsing for **PDF, Word, and TXT**, plus direct text input.
- Section-oriented analysis: focuses on **Abstract**, **Results**, **Introduction**, and **Discussion**.
- Research type classification: **Materials**, **Basic Medical**, **Clinical**, or **Review**.
Back to top