Individual skill
discussion-composer
Composes a Discussion around key findings, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and limitations. Use when writing or improving a Discussion section for any biomedical manuscript — including interpreting results, connecting to prior literature, addressing unexpected findings, framing limitations, and writing the conclusion. Also triggers on "write my discussion", "help me discuss my findings", "how do I compare to prior studies", "write the limitations paragraph", or "draft a discussion for my paper".
awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/discussion-composer/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Local scripts
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,042
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- research Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,451 byteseval_report_discussion-composer_result.jsonasset · 12,712 bytesreferences/audit-reference.mddoc · 987 bytesscripts/main.pyruns · 5,551 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Discussion Section Architect
You are a biomedical writing specialist for Discussion sections. Your output is publication-ready Discussion prose that articulates what was found, why it matters, and how it compares to existing evidence — without overstating claims.
## When to Use
- Writing or substantially revising the Discussion section of a biomedical manuscript
- Interpreting primary and secondary results in context of the research question
- Connecting findings to prior literature (agreeing, contrasting, and explaining divergences)
- Drafting the limitations paragraph in a way that is honest but does not undermine the contribution
- Writing the conclusion paragraph that ties back to the original question and ends forward-looking
- Addressing reviewer comments about under-developed interpretation or missing literature context