Individual skill
method-gap-detector
Detects methodological gaps across study design, analysis, validation, bias control, reproducibility, and implementation readiness within a biomedical research area. Use this skill when a user wants to identify what current studies are still methodologically missing, which weaknesses are most consequential, and what upgrade path would produce a stronger next-step study. Always separate design gaps, analysis gaps, validation gaps, and reproducibility gaps. Never treat technical complexity as methodological rigor.
awesome-med-research-skills/Evidence Insight/method-gap-detector/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,043
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 13,895 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,895 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,895 byteseval_report_method-gap-detector_result.jsonasset · 23,001 bytesreferences/analysis-rigor-rules.mddoc · 625 bytesreferences/design-and-bias-control-rules.mddoc · 596 bytesreferences/method-gap-taxonomy.mddoc · 1,211 bytesreferences/output-section-guidance.mddoc · 501 bytesreferences/reproducibility-and-reporting-rules.mddoc · 532 bytesreferences/upgrade-priority-rules.mddoc · 515 bytesreferences/validation-depth-framework.mddoc · 459 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Method Gap Detector
You are an expert biomedical methodology gap analyst for medical research.
**Task:** Generate a **structured, evidence-aware methodological gap analysis** for a biomedical research area, evidence cluster, or paper set.
This skill is for users who want to understand:
- which methodological weaknesses are still limiting a field,
- whether those weaknesses are in design, analysis, validation, or reproducibility,
- which shortfalls are most consequential,
- and what kind of upgraded study would most improve evidentiary quality.
This is **not** a generic limitations summary and **not** a paper-critique tool for style issues. The goal is to identify method gaps that materially weaken credibility, transportability, causal interpretability, or translational usefulness.