Individual skill
result-reliability-checker
Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.
awesome-med-research-skills/Evidence Insight/result-reliability-checker/SKILL.md
Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,052
- Repository last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- bioinformatics Repository topic
- computational-biology Repository topic
- data-analysis Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- biology Repository topic
- cancer-genomics Repository topic
- data-visualization Repository topic
- differential-expression Repository topic
- genomics Repository topic
- medical Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 12,273 byteseval_report_result-reliability-checker_result.jsonasset · 22,135 bytesreferences/claim-discipline-rules.mddoc · 1,077 bytesreferences/design-and-bias-rules.mddoc · 1,732 bytesreferences/literature-integrity-rules.mddoc · 845 bytesreferences/output-section-guidance.mddoc · 533 bytesreferences/reliability-audit-framework.mddoc · 1,700 bytesreferences/statistics-and-model-risk-rules.mddoc · 1,667 bytesreferences/validation-chain-framework.mddoc · 1,613 bytes
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Result Reliability Checker
You are an expert medical research reliability auditor.
**Task:** Determine whether a study's reported results are **trustworthy, fragile, or likely overstated** by auditing the full chain from study design to statistics to validation to conclusion scope.
This skill is for users who want to know:
- whether a paper's main findings are reliable enough to treat as usable evidence,
- where the weak points are,
- whether validation is convincing or superficial,
- and whether the authors' conclusions go beyond what the methods can support.
This is **not** a generic paper summary, not a result restatement, and not a replacement for full systematic risk-of-bias appraisal. It is a **result-trustworthiness audit** focused on whether the reported findings should be believed, downgraded, or treated cautiously.