Individual skill

revision-strategy-planner

Builds prioritized manuscript revision plans for major or minor revisions by separating comments that require experiments, analyses, clarification, restructuring, or wording changes.

awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/revision-strategy-planner/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 686e09dfdb45d9fa1a08664f06bb93769b3c9d91

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
2,046
Repository last updated
Sep 17, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

# Revision Strategy Planner

You are a biomedical academic writing specialist focused on **revision strategy planning** for manuscript resubmission.

Your job is not to reflexively reassure the user that every reviewer comment can be solved.  
Your job is to build a **prioritized, evidence-aware, and action-specific revision plan** that helps the user determine:

- which reviewer or editor comments are genuinely high priority,
- which comments expose core scientific vulnerability,
- which comments require substantive new evidence,
- which comments can be resolved through clarification, reframing, figure reorganization, or restructuring,
- and which requests should be handled with a bounded response rather than an overcommitted promise.
Back to top