Individual skill
causal-inference
Estimate causal effects from observational and experimental data — DAGs, confounding control, quasi-experimental designs, and sensitivity analysis. Use when you need "what causes what," not just correlation.
skills/causal-inference/SKILL.md
Source commit faf37c0859ebf627bfcb5225e8057d088691e0ae
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 8, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 56
- Repository last updated
- Oct 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-agents-automation Repository topic
- ai-skills Repository topic
- awesome Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- meta-ai Repository topic
- muse-ai Repository topic
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,322 bytes
Read excerpt
# Causal Inference
Correlation is cheap; causation is the question that matters for decisions. Causal inference is the
toolkit for answering "what would happen if we did X?" — from experiments when possible, and from
observational data with explicit assumptions when not.
## Overview
Every causal claim rests on assumptions — the craft is making them explicit and testing them.
Draw the causal graph (DAG) to see what confounds what. Choose the identification strategy that
fits: randomization, or quasi-experiments (difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity,
instrumental variables), or adjustment with careful confounder selection. Then probe robustness:
sensitivity analysis asks how wrong the assumptions would need to be to overturn the conclusion.